|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:00:27 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 5, 2009 20:00:27 GMT -5
...
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:02:26 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 5, 2009 20:02:26 GMT -5
I think you should ask these guys if they want my posts deleted, not me
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:13:29 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 5, 2009 20:13:29 GMT -5
Is that okay with you guys?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:28:51 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 5, 2009 20:28:51 GMT -5
I think you have to either delete them all, or delete none of them. Doing anything else would leave the impression that there is something specific in the ones you left that might be relevent, and that's not fair to either side. I guess you could just delete everything from page 6ish onward, when he started the full spam attack as a halfway measure.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:33:42 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 5, 2009 20:33:42 GMT -5
Okay, I will.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:36:40 GMT -5
Post by kat on Feb 5, 2009 20:36:40 GMT -5
I agree with Charlie. Maybe starting from the "You are my sunshine" post, right before the "Gettysburg address" series?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 20:59:38 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 5, 2009 20:59:38 GMT -5
I just deleted them all.
Ed made 150 posts for day 2 alone. Wow.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 21:20:18 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 5, 2009 21:20:18 GMT -5
*sniff*
all that hard work...gone
Go get them, guys
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 5, 2009 22:45:34 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 5, 2009 22:45:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 6, 2009 1:15:48 GMT -5
So the vote right now is to kill Rysto? I am fine with that. Who will be performing the NK? I only have a 50% chance, so I don't think it should be me. I do still have potions though. Any suggestions on a good use of potions? I still don't know what happened to Sinjin. I wonder if he is still affected by whatever I did. I didn't really notice anything during the day besides his hint about being rigid and hard.
Should I still hold off on the instant death? If so I am thinking confusion or essence of hate. Maybe on Chucara or Natlaw.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 10:46:40 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 10:46:40 GMT -5
Deleting them was fine with me. However, upon reflection, in the absence of a rule to the contrary, it was a valid strategy for us/gk to employ.
Mod Question: Can charle decide to make someone secretive if they were to "trophify" someone as opposed to "kill" them?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 10:53:41 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 10:53:41 GMT -5
And what in the world happened to Night 2 and Day 3?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 11:30:16 GMT -5
Post by kat on Feb 6, 2009 11:30:16 GMT -5
Time Warp?
I agree with targetting Rysto. And I'd say that either Dark Samus or Tabuu would need to be the targeter, since the other options have failure percentages--true that a Peach poisoning would still die at Dusk, but that'd still give him input in the Day's discussion.
And I think either of the targets you've listed would be good, Batman. I can see the possibility for confusion (based solely on the potion name) doing something to cause some suspicious posting from the target, so perhaps put that on Natlaw, who doesn't have previous games to use for comparison? If you think we can get him to drink.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 11:30:39 GMT -5
Post by flyingcowofdoom on Feb 6, 2009 11:30:39 GMT -5
Mod Question: Can charle decide to make someone secretive if they were to "trophify" someone as opposed to "kill" them? If Charle is not performing the SCUM kill, he can perform his own night action separately. And what in the world happened to Night 2 and Day 3? I have no idea what you're talking about. ;D --FCOD
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 12:07:28 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 12:07:28 GMT -5
I understand that FCoD. My question was the way i read his role is that he can't make someone secretive if they perform the night kill. But what about if I trophify someone can he make me secretive?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 13:03:36 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 6, 2009 13:03:36 GMT -5
Ah, clever, clever, catching a loophole.
Technically, yes. Actually...I'm not sure. I'll get back to you.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 13:21:19 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 6, 2009 13:21:19 GMT -5
Trophying is not killing, I'm pretty sure you said that yourself. So I see no reason why it wouldn't work that way.
And I realize that you also nerfed the poisoners ability when you made strategy discussion at night permissible. Heavy drinking only occurs when there's fluff only at Night. We should definately not hold any of the better ones back, since we won't really get many chances to use them.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 13:26:47 GMT -5
Post by pede on Feb 6, 2009 13:26:47 GMT -5
Trophying is not killing, I'm pretty sure you said that yourself. So I see no reason why it wouldn't work that way. And I realize that you also nerfed the poisoners ability when you made strategy discussion at night permissible. Heavy drinking only occurs when there's fluff only at Night. We should definately not hold any of the better ones back, since we won't really get many chances to use them. Yes, but it unnerfed Sheik who would otherwise get 5 strategy posts per day/night cycle. And you can use the loophole.Edit: After extensive mod and dead person consultation, I got outvoted. You can't use the loophole.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 13:28:17 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 13:28:17 GMT -5
totally agree with charle. i think i trophify rysto no matter what. if charle can make me secret then he does.
our poisoner should probably fire off with the most destructive one he has for the stated reasons.
and everyone else can chime in with what their plan is.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 14:30:14 GMT -5
Post by kat on Feb 6, 2009 14:30:14 GMT -5
I'm thinking of switching shaggy and MHaye, if no one else has any plans for them.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 15:57:43 GMT -5
Post by kat on Feb 6, 2009 15:57:43 GMT -5
I'm going to be heading out of town in about an hour or so, and will post my switch officially before I go.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:40:37 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 6, 2009 16:40:37 GMT -5
I'm thinking of switching shaggy and MHaye, if no one else has any plans for them. That sounds like a really good switch. I have a question for future reference. If a person drinks a potion and is switched will the poison effect the original person or the switched person?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:41:50 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 6, 2009 16:41:50 GMT -5
I will just wait for someone to drink again and I will poison one of the ones who drinks. That way at least I know it will work. Should I try to start the drinking thing again or is someone else going to do that?
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:44:43 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 6, 2009 16:44:43 GMT -5
I was thinking something like:
Finally Ed is gone. I will drink to that!
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:45:13 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 16:45:13 GMT -5
Either way. I am out of here in about an hour and will honestly be drinking at that point. So I don't mind if it hasn't gotten started on it's own by then.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:46:40 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 16:46:40 GMT -5
Can the dead scum still help us strategize if they are yet to be spoiled
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:48:15 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 6, 2009 16:48:15 GMT -5
I was thinking something like: Finally Ed is gone. I will drink to that! That's perfect. Ceasar any thoughts on your plans tonight. and charle since making me secret is off the table any inclinations at this point.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 16:51:24 GMT -5
Post by flyingcowofdoom on Feb 6, 2009 16:51:24 GMT -5
If a person drinks a potion and is switched will the poison effect the original person or the switched person? I don't know. Wait for pede Can the dead scum still help us strategize if they are yet to be spoiled Absolutely not. --FCOD
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 17:02:31 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 6, 2009 17:02:31 GMT -5
Hopefully the drinking will begin.
|
|
|
Night 2
Feb 6, 2009 17:07:45 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 6, 2009 17:07:45 GMT -5
OK I vote Alexander trophifies Rysto. Not that it's particularly up to me, but his stuffed head would make a nice piece of decoration on the scum mantelpiece. I imagine it mounted on polished silver and alabaster for a nice naturalistic theme.
I'm not going to start any random drinking games this time, sorry guys. OTOH, if you have a specific target in mind (and I do), it might be worth trying something. Don't forget that Roxio has a nightkill power tonight. Do we want to block it with a "sleep" potion or something? I might be able to tempt her into taking a drink by suggesting a night-protect to her or something and coding it with, "And if you think this is a good idea, have a drink on me!"
As for my pacmans, I'm up for suggestions. It'll either be an investigation or a protect. At this point I see no particular direct need to investigate someone, so I'd rather get another townie on my side by "doc"cing them. However, if anyone has an immediate investigation to suggest, now would be a good time.
Oh, and before I forget, I have mod questions. Here we go:
1) Was Roxis (and is whoever I protect) informed about how many pikmin were involved in digging the hole? Was it mentioned to her that only one creature, or pikmin or whatever, was involved, for example?
2) Was she told how much she'd been protected, either directly ("You now have a 25% chance of avoiding nightkill if you're targeted"), or indirectly ("A quarter of your body is buried")?
3) Do people who I investigate with pikmin KNOW they've been investigated?
4) If the answer to (3) is "yes", do they know the manner of their investigation (eg, they were searched by little people or whatever the heck pikmin are / look like)?
5) And most importantly, do I get another Pikmin tonight?
|
|