|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 17, 2009 8:40:16 GMT -5
Because murder is fun. ;D
Thoughts?
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 17, 2009 12:24:12 GMT -5
Three mislynches down, five to go. I say we either try Chronos and see if he's the Politician(the Town will go nuts if we nail another power role), or we take out a Mason.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 17, 2009 12:33:07 GMT -5
Check this out:
AllWalker and Nanook are the only ones that voted for Angel that we don't know the status of. I suggest one of them is the politician, as they bought my vote for Angel.
Therefore, taking one of them out might give a better shot at hitting the politician.
Having said that, I don't really care who we kill toNight.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 17, 2009 19:39:47 GMT -5
You might be on to something there, Mahaloth. AllWalker was one of the Pinkies voters, too.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 17, 2009 19:51:04 GMT -5
On the other hand, I can find little evidence that AllWalker was ever suspicious of either paul or you.
I'm leaning towards laying off the Politician toNight and taking out a mason. ToMorrow we get another couple of data points to try and narrow down who it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 17, 2009 21:26:31 GMT -5
On the other hand, I can find little evidence that AllWalker was ever suspicious of either paul or you. I'm leaning towards laying off the Politician toNight and taking out a mason. ToMorrow we get another couple of data points to try and narrow down who it is. So Meeko or Specialed? I'm hestiant to go for specialed, as he did a Wall of Words on me before anyone else. Meeko causes so much trouble, I'm not sure I want to go with him either. I truly prefer to kill specialed of the two. I can't stand the way he plays. It's totally OMGUS and so forth, but if we are doing one of them....I'd prefer him. Do you think it will genuinely throw suspicion on me if we take ed out? |
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 17, 2009 22:38:31 GMT -5
The go for TF of FS, both of them are doing WoW's also.
Besides, sometimes getting an OMGUS vote will get other people to come to your defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 17, 2009 22:38:55 GMT -5
Oh, and what about an investigation. Anyone really care who it is?
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 0:42:08 GMT -5
Ya know, if I wasn't a blackheart I'd be looking pretty closely at this Ed/Meeko thing. It seems like Meeko is trying REALLY hard to make sure everyone knows, and remembers, he's a mason. "Ed, there's a message for you in the masonry" "Don't look at my posts to closely, I'm a mason" etc etc etc
If I didn't know for sure that they weren't scum, I'd really be wondering if THEY'RE scum....wait, do you think...is it possible...might they be...sinners? I'm mean, they'd really be going out on a limb here, and I'm guessing it's not the case, but is it possible?
I say either lynch a mason, or I'll investigate one.
Maybe even protect the other one, just for kicks.
I was going to suggest that we start protecting ourselves soon, but upon re-reading what was said at the beginning, the protection only covers NK, not other night actions (so someone that is protected, could still be investigated, role blocked, etc). And since there doesn't appear to be anyone killing but us, I suppose our protection is useless at this point (right), so I'd say it really doesn't matter who we protect anymore, might as well protect town. Can use it later if we need to 'claim'
OTOH, there could still be a vigilante or someone else with the power to NK, but with some odd restrictions that's kept them from NK so far. (ie, only get to do it once, have to kill yourself if you kill town etc)
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 0:44:28 GMT -5
Another thing, did we protect one of our own one night? We really should, if we do need to claim, we would do it by saying "I protected |
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 7:14:10 GMT -5
I suggest we protect Mahaloth(me) or Joey. For the reasons Joey just said in the previous post. I make the most sense, as I'm doing the NK and their could(unlikely) be a vigilante.
Are you guys good with specialed dying then?
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 7:14:39 GMT -5
Investigate whomever you want, Joey. Even BillMC if you want.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 8:59:03 GMT -5
1. Allwalker (PURE)
3. BillMC
5. Chronos (PURE)
6. Peekercpa
7. Inner Stickler
10. Bear_Nenno
12. Meeko (MASON?)
13. Nanook
15. Special Ed. (MASON?)
18. Thing Fish
Here's the living list (not counting us). 7 of these people need to die.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 10:50:18 GMT -5
Investigate Thing Fish, if you have no other preference.
Do you guys care who dies? Can I just choose?
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 11:31:49 GMT -5
I'd stay away from Meeko as he just made a post about me.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 13:03:30 GMT -5
Meeko is an asset anyway. His confusion is the closest thing we have to a fourth scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 15:21:58 GMT -5
MEEKO!!!!!
When you eventually read this thread, understand that all that garbage you were posting, all that crap that even I, a Blackheart, tried to get you to stop doing, only helped scum. You had the board so cluttered with your nonsense that it left no time for scum hunting. I promise, that if I were town, you would have my vote, even as a mason, you'd have my vote just to get you out of the game.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 18, 2009 16:22:08 GMT -5
Well crap. You may be in trouble, Mahaloth.
If we take a shot at peeker, you're exposed even if he's bluffing.
If peeker claims cop, kill him. If he doesn't, I think we have to hold off and hope that he got lucky.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 18, 2009 16:39:18 GMT -5
Or not. Leave peeker be. I'm not sure if he's being deliberately obtuse or if he just doesn't get it, but he's got nothing on you. Just go in there and make it clear that you complained that he voted you based on something you said before you even got your role, and you'll be fine.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 18, 2009 17:03:04 GMT -5
This anti-peeker sentiment is excellent. If Mahaloth ever turns up dead, those who are after peeker right not look scummy.
Joey, stay out of this one.
|
|
rysto
Full Member
Posts: 190
|
Post by rysto on May 18, 2009 18:00:03 GMT -5
Well, we're running out of time.
Vote we kill Ed
I protect peeker
I'm protecting peeker for two reasons. First, it gives me plausible deniability for why I didn't protect Ed. Second, if he's not a power role he may decide to come clean, rather than have a doctor waste another protect on him.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 18:02:39 GMT -5
Let's settle this, then.
1. Who is getting killed?
2. Who is getting protected?
3. Who are we investigating?
I want to settle is by 10 PM.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 19:59:17 GMT -5
Mahaloth kills SpecialEd
Let me know if you want to change it, guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 21:24:51 GMT -5
Joey, stay out of this one. As of when I made my statement above, I'm not messing with any of that anymore. Townies, when you read this...You're acting like a bunch of idiots. Anyways, I've tried, honestly (as someone who actually wants to play the game) to get Meeko to contain himself. At this point I'm just going to let them all self destruct. If it keeps up, I think Meeko will wind up getting himself lynched. |
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 21:28:52 GMT -5
Mahaloth kills SpecialEdLet me know if you want to change it, guys. That could be interesting. First off, I'm all for killing a mason, if there's a third (and I think there is), they'll have to claim tomorrow, or finish the game as unconfirmed as, well, me. Also, this is where we are going to find out if Meeko is just being Meeko, or if Ed is the driving force here. It's likely Meeko is acting like an ass to get himself lynched thereby saving Ed and the other Mason. Or course, maybe they want us to think that, and it's really Meeko that has more power. WiFoM to the letter. As for the investigation, probably doesn't matter, I think I'll go with Peeker. He'll be easy to make a case against, and if we lynch him as a Sinner, we'll/I'll be a hero. |
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 18, 2009 21:34:09 GMT -5
Hey, put your investigation and protection in! Night ends tomorrow at noon.
I still think I should be protected, but whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 18, 2009 21:55:20 GMT -5
Also, something to consider.
Town doesn't really seem to have any concerns about the masons being who they say they are, but keep in mind that killing Ed, will confirm Meeko.
OTOH, it would be quite the score if Ed turns out to be either NOT a busybody or turns out to be a sinner. If either one of those things happen, Meeko would by lynched immediately. But I wouldn't count on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahaloth on May 19, 2009 7:35:20 GMT -5
Did you guys put our Night Action in?
|
|
|
|
Post by pede on May 19, 2009 8:59:52 GMT -5
Got it.
|
|
|
|
Post by joeyp on May 19, 2009 9:01:39 GMT -5
Did you guys put our Night Action in? Yup, PM'd mine yesterday |
|
