|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:35:32 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 3, 2009 22:35:32 GMT -5
In the meantime, I'm gonna shut up now I think, and let this one play out without me.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:18:05 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 3, 2009 23:18:05 GMT -5
Am actually pissing myself. Seriously, if you can pull off A post, B post, C post you will be my Og forever.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:22:29 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 3, 2009 23:22:29 GMT -5
You rock. Fucking hilarious. Keep it up until the town dawgs say uncle.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:58:29 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 3, 2009 23:58:29 GMT -5
Ok, and I re-skimmed again. To the extent that you can or/are willing to keep it up, do so. Sheesh, this is funny. Looking for a post of substance has become impossible. Couple more hundred, and your job is done. Day two becomes essentially a throwaway, which is what we wanted anyways.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 0:11:18 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 4, 2009 0:11:18 GMT -5
thanks.
But I must sleep and work.
HOpefully they'll kill me soon, but my schedule will give them the opportunity to talk a lot. I should have started this sooner.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 4:36:15 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 4:36:15 GMT -5
Where/when did blockey make the "mole" comment?
And Mason Scumlord please get some beauty sleep. But FCS don't ge Ogkilled. However, the rest of the randomness is awesome. If there is any way that you can mention everyone else at least once that would be icing on the cake. And seriously a dozen or so meaningless posts every now and then is perfect. Just get the thread veeerrryyy long.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 5:53:58 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 5:53:58 GMT -5
In the meantime, I'm gonna shut up now I think, and let this one play out without me. I would tend to agree. With our all knowing Mason Scumlord providing a whole shitpot of static it is not necessary for us to do squat. Hunker down and let GK just sprea his gospel of confusion. BTW, each time I read the thread it gets funnier. Sheeps, my friend, I am just kind of jealous at this point.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 8:41:41 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 8:41:41 GMT -5
Ok. This has officially passed Zuma and Top Dog. I literally am laughing so hard that I am sure that I wet myself.
Onward soldiers.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 11:01:06 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 4, 2009 11:01:06 GMT -5
This is the greatest moment in the history of Mafia.
I especially like that you're mixing in just enough truth with the utter lies that nothing you say will be at all believable.
I partially disagree with peeker. I think you should pointedly fail to mention some people. Not all Town either. Do something like 2 town and 1 of us.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:03:33 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 4, 2009 12:03:33 GMT -5
Where/when did blockey make the "mole" comment? That's a good question actually... the only person whose radar I seem to be on right now is KidV's, and while he makes one good point, his suspicions are largely OMGUS. Nobody else seems to be buying them. Hell, even Parzival has come right off my case.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:05:39 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 4, 2009 12:05:39 GMT -5
ACtually forget that... he's referring to the Mason mole, not me. Mole = confusing.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:26:29 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 12:26:29 GMT -5
And charle is even more dead on. I was just wondering if "mole" could be a crumb but I can't find the original quote.
My god, this is he flippin larious. Go GK, go. I don't think I have laughed so hard in my life. I especially am liking the random breaks. Is another high tide on the horizon?
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:29:30 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 12:29:30 GMT -5
Snorkel On.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 18:28:56 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 4, 2009 18:28:56 GMT -5
am I dead yet?
I'm home from work now
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 18:29:53 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 4, 2009 18:29:53 GMT -5
Nope, and the thread is sadly Ed free currently! They're starting to talk about stuff that isn't you again, this is unacceptable.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 18:48:13 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 18:48:13 GMT -5
Once again into the breach. Go Gk, go.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 19:05:37 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 4, 2009 19:05:37 GMT -5
Ack, that Zelda comment was very dangerous. I hope no one else picks up on it.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 19:55:24 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 4, 2009 19:55:24 GMT -5
Possible Reactions to Kid Vermicious #9723541246:1) Ignore him. (Possible.) 2) Post THIS: Hey, Molefan, mebbe you missed it, but these questions weren't rhetorical: 1) Directly - nothing whatsoever. That's not why I'm suspicious of you. If I think that your doing so might be part of an agenda to take make it look as though you know nothing about scum mechanics in the game, that's suspicious. 2) Because I didn't notice it when Blockey used it. (If it was in the middle of Special Ed's Niagran torrent of fluff, I would probably have missed it.) Right now I don't have a read on Blockey one way or the other. Quote please? 3) I've played as scum with Hoopy on my team and followed him for six days straight in that same game. I've also played with him for the best part of nine game days in "Arkham Knights" when he wasn't scum. There's a huge difference in aggression factor alone, as well as a few other things like the content of his posts. Call it gut instinct based on experience if you want, but he's been pinging me as pro-town since late in day one, and if he's not then right now he's got me fooled. OK now I have one question for you. I originally suspected all three of the people I'm now voting for based on a perception that one or more of their posts was anti-town. I've used logic to justify or validate those suspicions (witness Zeriel, even when there was a 1/3 chance that he was scum I still put him dead last because, even though my gut always says he's scummy, I couldn't justify that with any evidence) but basically my suspicions so far have been based on a gut feeling that post X or statement Y looks anti-town. They've had to be, we've essentially one and a half days' worth of voting / posts to look at and very little else. This, BTW, seems to be your basic problem with my vote against you - that it's suspicion that's then justified with logic, not based on it. If you'd come out against both my cases - against you and Nanook - I'd be a lot less suspicious of you right now. You made the point that early on you voted people based on their votes for Nanook. Why not do the same thing with me? I don't think my case against him is any stronger than my case against you. It can't be, the evidence isn't there yet. All I've basically got against him is an intuition that when he posts - which is rare - he doesn't seem interested in helping the town. Plus his voting on day one matches what scum would do IMO (as does about a dozen other people's). This is pretty inconclusive stuff, largely based on gut. Yet you've ignored my case against Nanook and gone straight for my case against you. That feels like "OMGUS". So please justify why you've objected to my case against you, but completely ignored my similar, gut-based logic-justified case against Nanook? 3) Post the above, but stripped down. 4) Post something completely different. COMMENTS PLEASE. I'm really not the best judge of what's scummy and what's not when it comes to my own posts!
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 20:01:15 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 4, 2009 20:01:15 GMT -5
it looks good to me, but, in all honesty, my mind is warped right now. All this posting is starting to get to me
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 20:03:51 GMT -5
Post by nanook on Feb 4, 2009 20:03:51 GMT -5
That first bullet point feels...off to me. I can't really place my finger on why though. I would reword it.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 20:07:38 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 20:07:38 GMT -5
Gk, go on and on.
Trophiphy KidV.
I want some killing action.
Kat?
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 22:23:06 GMT -5
Post by virginmary on Feb 4, 2009 22:23:06 GMT -5
GK. It only gets more priceless. Mother of Og.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 0:54:17 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 5, 2009 0:54:17 GMT -5
Gawd, no! DON'T trophify KidV! There are several people suspicious of him, and precisely one person suggesting suspicion of me. Let him blow off steam and attract more suspicion on himself!
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 0:55:21 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 5, 2009 0:55:21 GMT -5
To add to that - what the heck if he's not a malicious PFK (although I'm rather thinking he is right now)? If he comes up town, and the scum have obviously offed him, it's practically condemning me!
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 3:53:16 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 5, 2009 3:53:16 GMT -5
I really don't have anything to post in the main thread. I hope nobody calls me out for lurking.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 16:33:12 GMT -5
Post by kat on Feb 5, 2009 16:33:12 GMT -5
I would say definitely, don't off KidV at this point. I want to think a bit before suggesting any targets, cuz I'm on prescription drugs right now.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 16:35:36 GMT -5
Post by crazypunker22 on Feb 5, 2009 16:35:36 GMT -5
We still have Hoopy...
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 17:16:25 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 5, 2009 17:16:25 GMT -5
Well right now I'm liking Rysto. KidV may mock my intuition, but I'm not in any way lying about my town-read on Hoopy. Apart from him, Rysto is the player I've spent most game-time with on this board, and in "Arkham Nights" we got to the end together. He pretty much evaded suspicion as the cop from the start by staying under the radar early on and putting up a fairly convincing show as vanilla town until he outed himself later on. It feels like he's doing the same thing here.
Hoopy might be dangerous down the line, but right now he's aggressively pursuing a false trail. Let him have his fun. I'd rather get him on my side with another "protect" tonight. He's an obvious choice for it. If he and Roxis - two fairly strong town-oriented people I think - think I'm on their side, all the better.
Alternatively I could always investigate someone for power-roledom. I'd rather not pull the trigger on Nanook yet for at least another round. In the meantime, I can always keep my FoS on the likes of Chuchura and KidVermicious. The only problem with an investigation is that, for it to be any use, I'd have to sacrifice at least two pikmin. Considering I can get an extra nightkill by saving up five (now I have a purple one, which counts as two) I'd rather save my investigation until we have a lot more pressing need of it.
And obviously I can't nightkill. Although I still have my little purple fella for some serious muscle when the time comes...
So you guys. What do you think - do I try and get another townie on my side (Hoopy preferably), or go for an investigation?
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 17:18:05 GMT -5
Post by molefan1981 on Feb 5, 2009 17:18:05 GMT -5
Just reread, and came across this: "Little purple fella". OMG that sounded sooooo wrong.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 5, 2009 18:58:29 GMT -5
Post by mrspecialed on Feb 5, 2009 18:58:29 GMT -5
am I dead yet?
|
|